Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Scott Alan Miller

The True Cost of Printing

Of all of the things that are handled by your technology support department, printing is likely the one that you think about the least.  Printing isn’t fancy or exciting or a competitive advantage.  It is a lingering item from an age without portable reading devices, from an era before monitors.  Printers are going to be around for a long time to come, I do not wish to imply that they are not, but there is a lot to be considered when it comes to printers and much of that consideration can be easily overlooked.

When considering the cost of printing we often calculate the cost of the printer itself along with the consumables: paper and ink.  These things alone rack up a pretty serious per-page cost for an average business.  Planning for an appropriate lifespan and duty cycle of a printer are critical to making printing remain cost effective.  And do not forget the cost of parts replacement as well as stock-piled ink and paper.  These may seem minor, but printers often cause an investment in inventory that is never recovered.  When the printer dies, supplies for that printer are often useless.

The big, hidden cost of printing is none of these things. The big cost is in supporting the printers, both upfront with the initial deployment but even moreso in continuing support.  This is especially true in a smaller shop where the trend is to use many small printers rather than fewer large ones.  Deploying and supporting a five thousand dollar central office printer is no more than, and possibly lower than, the cost of deploying a two hundred dollar desktop inkjet.  The bigger the printer the better the support in drivers and support from the vendor that can usually be expected making normal support tasks easier and more reliable.

At a minimum, rolling out a new desktop printer is going to take half an hour.  Realistically it is far more likely to take closer to an hour.  Go ahead, count up the time: time to deliver printer to station, time to unpack printer, time to physically set up printer, time to plug in printer, time to install printer drivers and software, time to set up printer and time to print a test page.  If it was a one time race, you could probably do these steps pretty quickly.  But printer support is not a production line and rarely, if ever, do you have someone with these exact steps being performed in a rapidly repeatable manner.  Likely installing a printer is a “one off” activity that requires learning the new printer, tracking down the current driver and troubleshooting potential issues.

An hour to deploy a two hundred dollar printer could add fifty percent to the cost of the printer quite easily.  There are a lot of factors that can cause this number to skyrocket from a long travel distance between receiving location and the desk to missing cables to incompatible drivers.  Any given printer could take the better part of a day to deploy when things go wrong.  We are not even considering “disruption time” – that time in which the person receiving the printer is unable to work since someone is setting up a printer at their workstation.

Now that the printer has been set up and is, presumably, working just fine we need to consider the ongoing cost of printer support.  It is not uncommon for a printer to sit, undisturbed, for years chugging along just fine.  But printers have a surprisingly high breakage rate caused by the nature of ink, the nature of paper, a propensity for printers to be reassigned to different physical locations or for the machine to which they are attached to be changed or updated introducing driver breakage.  Add these things together and the ongoing support cost of a printer can be surprisingly high.

I recently witnessed the support of a company with a handful of high profile printers.  In a run of documentation, physical cabling and driver issues the printers were averaging between four and eight hours of technician time, per printer, to set up correctly.  Calculate out the per hour cost for that support and those printers, likely already costly, just became outrageously expensive.

I regularly hear of shops that decide to re-purpose printers and spend many times the cost of the printers in labor hours as older printers are massaged into working with newer computer setups or vice versa. Driver incompatibility or unavailability is far more common than people realize.

Printers have the additional complication of being used in many different modes such as directly attached to a workstation, directly attach and shared, directly attached to a print server, directly attached to the network or attached to a print server over the network.  While this complexity hardly creates roadblocks it does significantly slow work done on printers in a majority of businesses.

Printers, by their nature, are very difficult to support remotely.  Getting a print driver installed remotely is easy.  Knowing that something has printed successfully is something completely different.  Considering that printer support should be one of the lower cost support tasks this need for physical on-site presence for nearly every printer support task dramatically increases the cost of support if only because it increases the time to perform a task and receive appropriate feedback.

When we take these costs and combine them with the volume of printing normally performed by a printer we can start to acquire a picture of what printing is really costing.  The value to centralized printing suddenly takes on a new level of significance when seen through the eyes of support rather than through the eyes of purchasing.  Even beyond centralizing printing when possible it is important to eliminate unnecessary printing.

Good planning, strategic purchasing and a holistic approach can mitigate the potential for surprise costs in printing.

 

Share
Scott Alan Miller

Apple’s Roadmap for iOS

Guessing at a company’s roadmap is always a dangerous venture.  In the case of Apple today and their iOS family of products, it feels less like predicting a roadmap and more like computing a trajectory.  Apple has some serious, game changing strategy already in motion and seeing where they intend to take it seems pretty reliable.  I know that many industry pundits have covered this ground as it has been a very popular topic as of late, but I wanted to add my own voice and viewpoint to the discussion.

Over the past several years Apple has been making a lot of seemingly disconnected and questionable decisions around their purchases, research and product releases.  Each piece, seen individually, makes little sense to the outside observer.  Taken together, however, we are piecing together a picture of what appears to be grand design and careful planning.

Rapidly Apple’s fortunes have shifted from its traditional desktop market (Mac OSX) to its portable device market (iOS.)  This began, innocuously, with the iPod and slowly turned into the iPhone, iPad and, most recently, the AppleTV.  The AppleTV is the really interesting player here as this device in its first iteration was based on OSX but in its second iteration became an iOS product.  Apple actually morphed a product from one line into the other.  Very telling.

The most interesting piece of the iOS puzzle, to me, is the App Store.  The App Store seems like little more than a neat way to funnel end user funds into Apple’s ample pockets and, on the surface, it certainly was a huge success in that area.  However, the App Store represents far more than a simple attempt at increasing profit margins.  No the App Store has brought a paradigm shift to the way that end users acquire, install and manage applications.  This shift is nothing new to the technical world of Linux desktop users who have long had simple software acquisition systems that the App Store mimics but the App Store brings the ease of use of Linux’s package management to the mainstream market and does so with a revenue model that does wonders for Apple at the same time.

The App Store makes the entire process of discovering and acquiring new software nearly painless for their customers which encourages those customers to buy more apps, more often.  Traditionally computer owners buy software very infrequently.  Even with the ease of Internet downloads the rate at which software is purchased is relatively low due to complexity caused by differences between download sites, concerns over compatibility, concerns over security and quality and the need to establish a transactional relationship with the software company to facilitate payment.  The App Store solves all of those issues and also makes finding new software much easier as there is a central repository which can be searched.  By doing this, Apple’s customers are purchasing software at an incredible pace.

Apple has many reasons to look more favorably upon its iOS product family than its more traditional products.  The old Mac lineup is, in reality, just another PC in a commodity market.  While OSX has some interesting features compared to Windows it is hardly a majorly differentiated product and with Linux rapidly cutting into the PC market in the netbook and alternative computing device space there is less and less room for OSX to play in.  The iOS devices, running on Apple’s own A4 processor, offer Apple the unique opportunity to engineer their products from the ground up as a completely controlled vertical stack – they control every significant piece of hardware and software giving them unprecedented control.  This control can be leveraged into awesome stability and integration as well as profit as few outside vendors are looking for their piece of the pie.

A fully integrated hardware and operating system stack also gives Apple’s development partners an opportunity to leverage their skills to the fullest – just as video game console developers know that underpowered consoles will often outperform desktop PCs simply because the developers have an opportunity to really tweak the code just for that one, stable device.  iOS offers this in a different environment.  Unlike developing for Android or Windows Phones, iOS offers a highly stable and well known ecosystem for developers to code against allowing them to leverage more of the platform with less effort.

The iOS devices, being based on a highly efficient operating system and being built on a very low power consumption platform designed for mobility, offer significant “green” advantages over many traditional devices.  This could be Apple’s new niche.  The power user market is all but lost and Apple quietly bowed out of their long-forgotten server market this past January.  This takes Apple to the other side of the spectrum entirely, but one where Apple seems to really understand what is needed and what their market wants.  Rather than being niche, Apple is poised to be a dominant player, and there is no denying that lower power consumption “green” devices will only continue to be important in the future.

In short order, Apple is going to be in a position to control an entire ecosystem ranging from mobile computing platforms, mobile telephony, fixed television-attached media devices and, with only minor effort, desktop computing.  Desktop computing may seem like an odd place for the iOS system to go, but if we really think about what Apple is developing here, it makes perfect sense.  The transition won’t be overnight, but it is sure to come.

The first step of the transition is hard to see but it involved the AppleTV.  The AppleTV 2.0 is an iOS device that is non-mobile working its way into peoples’ homes.  Currently it is designed to function purely as a media center device, but all of the iOS functionality is there, dormant, waiting for the day when Apple decides to release an app interface and AppleTV App Store loaded with apps controlled via wireless remote, BlueTooth keyboard or whatever input device Apple decides to provide for the AppleTV.  The only things keeping the AppleTV from becoming a full fledged iOS-based desktop today is a lack of USB into which to attach keyboard and mouse and Apple’s reluctance to provide a desktop environment and App Store for the AppleTV.  The foundation is there and ready to be activated.

In reality, we are early on in the iOS lifecycle and while the platform that Apple has chosen is very mature for mobile devices it is extremely underpowered for a desktop experience.  Each generation brings more computing power to the platform, however, and in very short order a desktop based on a later revision Apple processor and iOS may easily exceed the average user’s desktop expectations.  Most home users find their desktops today to be significantly overpowered for their basic needs of email, web browsing, watching Netflix and YouTube, etc.  These are tasks for which many people are switching to their iPads already.  In another generation or two of processors we may see an AppleTV-like device that draws only four or five watts of power able to adequately power the average user’s desktop computing needs.

The second step is in the newly added App Store appearing in Mac OSX.  The addition of the App Store to the Mac platform means that the beginning of the transition is underway.  Incumbent Mac users are now being introduced to the concept of finding software, acquiring it and installing it all through a simple, integrated system just as iPhone and iPad users have been using for years now.  Had the App Store and all of its cost and limitations been introduced to users and developers on the Mac first it would have likely been shunned and faded away without real comment.  But today the Mac landscape is far different.

The plan, as I see it, with the Mac platformed App Store is to begin centralizing critical apps for the Mac ecosystem into the App Store.  Over the next two to three years this process is likely to see all major apps move in this direction leaving only smaller, less popular apps out to be handled through the traditional purchase and install system.  Once a critical mass of apps has been reached and the iOS hardware platform has matured to a point where the speed is adequate for daily desktop computing tasks Apple will flip the switch and change out the Mac OSX desktop for a new iOS desktop that is either a sister of the AppleTV or, potentially, they will simply use the AppleTV device itself encouraging Apple users to see the world of desktop computing and media delivery as one – not as unlikely as some might think given the combination of the two so common on iOS mobile devices today.

An iOS desktop could be very attractive to home users.  Many businesses might be willing to jump at the chance to move to well polished, low power consumption devices for their non-power user staff.  Those needing more power might look to use them as little more than thin clients as well.  There are many options around such a low cost device – low cost to purchase and low cost to operate.  As many companies are already forced to implement iOS management for their existing iPad and iPhone devices, adding in iOS desktop devices might be a trivial matter.  Apple has conquered many of the hurdles that it faced with Mac OSX for the iOS platform before they’ve even announced plans to make such a desktop device.

The laptop space, where Apple has a strong foothold today, is possibly the easiest platform to migrate.  The iPad is almost a full fledged laptop today.  All Apple needs to do is to add a hinge and a keyboard and they would have a device that works like an iPad but looks like the Macbook Air.  An easy transition likely to be heralded by Apple and its users alike.

Apple excels at subversive technology.  The iPod and iPhone, and to some extent now the iPad, snuck into the market as media players or phones but emerged as highly mobile computing devices used for all sort of tasks and spurred on by the success of social media.  But they sneakily did one more thing – in only a few years time the iPod Touch went from being a MP3 player and email device to being one of the most popular mobile video game platforms making Nintendo shake and basically removing Sony from the game altogether.  No one bought the iPod Touch with the intent of making it their new, primary video game device, but it happened and the iPod is an excellent video game platform that is only just beginning to see its own potential.  The iPad is following close in its stead.  It is not necessarily that the iOS platforms are the best possible mobile video game devices but that they are purchased for other purposes and are “good enough” for most of the gaming population.  What the Wii wanted to be for consoles, the device that brought non-gamers into the gaming fold, the iPod truly did for mobile gaming.

The AppleTV is now perfectly poised to do the same thing that the iPod did for mobile gaming for the console market.  As more and more game makers focus on the iOS platform it will become increasingly apparent that the AppleTV, sitting already attached to many television monitors all over the world, is a video game console already purchased and ready to go.  What the Wii did in the last generation for the console the AppleTV is ready to do for the next.  Nintendo already proved that the largest segment of the video gaming market is primarily casual gamers who are not significantly concerned with having the latest, most powerful platform or the best games.

The AppleTV could provide an even less expensive gaming console with more features than the Wii that is far more attractive for developers who can utilize the same resources that they use to make games for all of Apple’s other iOS platforms.  Almost overnight, Apple has made the basis for a video gaming ecosystem that can rival nearly any in existence today.  And, of course, in time the AppleTV platform will get more and more powerful – slowly catching up to the more expensive video game consoles making it increasingly eligible as a serious platform contender for hard core console gamers.

Apple has a lot of pokers in the iOS fire but, if executed correctly, the potential is immense.

It will take a few years for Apple to completely phase out the long standing Mac family and users will be resistant, if only for nostalgic reasons, and Apple has a few versions of Mac OSX up their sleeves yet, but I believe that the march towards a unified platform under the iOS banner is inevitable.  iOS represents the future, not only for Apple but for much of the industry.  Lower power consumption, ease of use and a minimum of different parts between many different devices.  I, for one, am very excited to see what Apple can do with such a tightly integrated ecosystem and believe that Apple has more opportunity to do great things with iOS than it ever did with the Mac platform.  This could truly be a dawning of great things for Apple and a paradigm shift for end users.

Share

Downtime – now that is a word that no one wants to hear.  It strikes fear into the heart of businesses, executives and especially IT staff.  Downtime costs money and it causes frustration.

Because downtime triggers an emotional reaction businesses are often left reacting to it differently than traditional business factors.  This emotional approach causes businesses, especially smaller businesses often lacking in rational financial controls, to treat downtime as being far worse than it is.  It is not uncommon to find that smaller businesses have actually done more financial damage to themselves reacting to a fear of potential downtime than the feared downtime would have inflicted had it actually occurred.  This is a dangerous overreaction.

The first step is to determine the cost of downtime.  In IT we are often dealing with rather complex systems and downtime comes in a variety of flavors such as loss of access, loss of performance or a complete loss of a system or systems.  Determining every type of downtime and its associated costs can be rather complex but a high level view is often enough for producing rational budgets or are, at the very least, a good starting point on a path towards understanding the business risks involved with downtime.  Keep in mind that just like spending too much to avoid downtime is bad that spending too much to calculate the costs of downtime is bad.  Don’t spend so much time and resources determining if you will lose money that you would have been better off just losing it.  Beware of the high cost of decision making.

We can start by considering only complete system loss.  What is the cost of organizational downtime for you – that is, if you had to cease all business for an hour or a day how much money is lost?  In some cases the losses could be dramatic, like in the case of a hospital where a day of downtime would result in a loss of faith and future customer base and potentially result in lawsuits.  But in many cases a day of downtime might have nominal financial impact – many businesses could simply call the day a holiday, let their staff rest for the day and have people work a little harder over the next few days to make up the backlog from the lost day.  It all comes down to how your business does and can operate and how well suited you are for mitigating lost time.  Many business will only look at daily revenue figures to determine lost revenue but this can be wildly misleading.

Once we have a rough figure for downtime cost we can then consider downtime risk.  This is very difficult to assess as good figures on IT system reliability are nearly non-existent and every organization’s systems are so unique that industry data is very nearly useless.  Here we are forced to rely on IT staff to provide an overview of risks and, hopefully, a reliable assessment of likelihoods of individual risks.  For example, in big round numbers, if we had a line of business application that ran on a server with only one hard drive then we would expect that sometime in the next five to ten years that there will be downtime associated with the loss of that drive.  If we have that same server with hot swap drives in a mirrored array then the likelihood of downtime associated with that storage system, even over ten years, is quite small.  This doesn’t mean that a drive is not likely to fail, it is, but that the system is likely to be unaffected until redundancy is restored without end users noticing that anything has happened.

Our last rough estimation tool is to apply applicable business hours.  Many businesses do not run 24×7, some do, of course, but most do not.  Is the loss of a line of business application at six in the evening equivalent to the loss of that application at ten in the morning?  What about on the weekend?  Are people productively using it at three on a Friday afternoon or would losing it barely cost a thing and make for happy employees getting an extra hour or two on their weekends?  Can schedules be shifted in case of a loss near lunch time?  These factors while seemingly trivial can be significant.  If downtime is limited to only two to four hours then many businesses can mitigate nearly all of the financial impact simply by asking employees to have a little flexibility in their schedules to accommodate the outage by taking lunch early or leaving work early one day and working an extra hour the next.

Now that we have these factors  – the cost of downtime, the ability to mitigate downtime impact based on duration and the risks of outage events we can begin to draw a picture of what a downtime event is likely to look like.  From this we can begin to derive how much money it would be worth to reduce the risk of such as event.  For some businesses this number will be extremely high and for others it will be surprisingly low.  This exercise can expose a great deal about how a business operates that may not be normally all that visible.

It is important to note at this point that what we are looking at here is a loss of availability of systems, not a loss of data.  We are assuming that good backups are being taken and that those backups are not compromised.  Redundancy and downtime are not topics related to data loss, just availability loss.  Data loss scenarios should be treated with equal or greater diligence but are a separate topic.  It is a rare business that can survive catastrophic data loss but common to experience and easily survive even substantial downtime.

There are multiple ways to stave off downtime, redundancy is highly visible and treated almost like a buzz word and so receives a lot of focus, but there are other means as well.  Good system design is important, avoiding system complexity can heavily reduce downtime simply by removing points of unnecessary risk and fragility.  Using quality hardware and software is important as well – as low end hardware that is redundant will often fail just as often as non-redundant enterprise class hardware.  Having a rapid supply chain of replacement parts can be a significant factor often seen in the form of four hour hardware vendor replacement part response contracts.  This list goes on.  What we will focus on is redundancy which is where we are most likely to overspend when faced with the fear of downtime.

Now that we know the costs of failing to have adequate redundancy we can compare this potential cost against the very real, up front cost of providing that redundancy.  Some things, such as hard drives, are highly likely to fail and relatively easy and cost effective to make redundant – taking significant risk and trivializing it.  These tend to be a first point of focus.  But there are many areas of redundancy to consider such as power supplies, network hardware, Internet connections and entire systems – often made redundant through modern virtualization techniques providing new avenues for redundancy previously not accessible to many smaller businesses.

New types of redundancy, especially those made available through virtualization, are often a point where businesses will be tempted to overspend, perhaps dramatically, compared to the risks of downtime.  Worse yet, in the drive to acquire the latest fads in redundancy companies will often implement these techniques incorrectly and actually introduce greater risk and a higher likelihood of downtime compared to having done nothing at all.  It is becoming increasingly common to hear of businesses spending tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in an attempt to mitigate a downtime monetary loss of only a few thousand dollars – and to then fail in that attempt and end up increasing their risk anyway.

When gauging the cost of mitigation it is critical to remember that mitigation is a guaranteed expense where risk is only a risk.  Much like auto insurance where you pay a guaranteed small monthly fee in order to fend off a massive, unplanned expense.   The theory of risk mitigation is to spend a comparatively small amount of money now in order to reduce the risk of a large expense later, but if the cost of mitigation gets too high then it becomes better to simply accept the risks.

Systems can be assessed individually, of course.  Keeping a web presence and telephone system up and running at all times is far more important than an email system where even hours of downtime are unlikely to be detectable by external clients.  Paying only to protect those systems where the cost of downtime is significant is an important strategy.

Do not be surprised if what you discover is that beyond some very basic redundancy (such as mirrored hard drives) that a simple network design with good backups and restore plans and a good hardware support contract is all that is needed for the majority, if not all, of your systems.  By lowering the complexity of your systems you make them naturally more stable and easier to manage – further reducing the cost of your IT infrastructure.

Share
Scott Alan Miller

Patching in a Small Environment

In enterprise IT shops, system patching is a complicated process involving large numbers of test systems which mirror production systems so that each new patch arriving from operating system and software vendors can be tested in a real world environment to see how they interact with the hardware and software combinations available in the organization.  In an ideal world, every shop would have a managed patching process that immediately responded to newly published patches, tested instantly and applied as soon as the patch was deemed safe and applicable.  But the world is not an ideal one and in real life we have to make due with limited resources: physical, temporal and financial.

Patches are generally released for a few key reasons: security, stability, performance and, occasionally, to supply new features.  Except for the addition of new features, which is normally handled through a different release process, patches represent a fix to a known issue.  This is not a “if it is not broken, don’t fix it” scenario but is a “it is broken and has not completely failed yet” scenario which demands attention – the sooner the better.  Taking a “sit back and wait” approach to patches is unwise as the existence of a new patch means that malicious hackers have a “fix” to analyze and even if an exploit did not exist previously, it will very shortly.  The release of the patch itself can be the trigger for the immediate need for said patch.

This patch ecosystem creates a need for a “patch quickly” mentality.  Patches should never sit, they need to be applied often as soon as they are released and tested.  Waiting to patch can mean running with critical security bugs or keeping systems unnecessarily unreliable.

Small IT shops rarely, if ever, have test environments whether for servers, networking equipment or even desktops.  Not ideal but, realistically, even if those environments were available few small shops have the excess human IT resources available to run those tests in a timely manner.

This is not as bleak as it sounds.  The testing done for most patches is redundant with patching already tested by the vendor.  Vendors cannot possibly test every hardware and software interaction that could ever happen with their products but they generally test wide ranges of permutations and look at areas where interactions are most likely.  It is rare for a major vendor to cripple their own software with bad patches.  Yes, it does happen and having good backups and rollback plans are important, but in day to day operations, patching is a relatively safe process that is far more important to do promptly than it is to wait for opportunities that may or may not occur.

Like any system change, patches are best applied in frequent, small dosages.  If patches are applied promptly then normally only one or a few patches must be applied at the same time.  For operating systems you may still have to deal with multiple patches at one time, especially if patching only weekly, but seldom must you patch dozens or hundreds of files at one time when done in this manner.  When done like this it is vastly easier to evaluate patches for adverse affects and to roll back if a patch process goes badly.

The worst scenario for a small business lacking a proper patch testing workflow is to wait on patches.  Waiting means that systems go without needed care for long periods of times and when patches are finally applied it is often in large, bulk patch processes.  Applying many patches at once increases the chances that something will go wrong and, when it does, identifying which patch(es) is at fault and producing a path to remediation can be much more difficult.

Delayed patching is a process that provides little or no advantage to either IT or a business but does carry substantial risk to security, stability and performance.  Best practices for patching in a small environment is either to allow systems to self patch as quickly as possible or to schedule a regular patching process, perhaps weekly, during a time when the business is most prepared for patching to fail and patch remediation to be handled.  Whether you choose to patch automatically or simply to do so regularly through a manual process, patch often and promptly for best results.

Share
Scott Alan Miller

Never Get Advice from a Reseller (or Vendor)

This is general business advice that often applies to IT but is certainly not limited to that realm alone.  Outside support in IT comes from two main sources: firms who are paid (by you) to advise you and firms paid (by you) to sell you something.  The first are what we generally consider consultants.  The second are what we call resellers.

The simple rule of thumb is – never, ever get advice from a reseller.  At least not general advice, at best very specific advice centered purely around only the products that that reseller sells.  This isn’t to say that resellers are bad, far from it.  In fact, the reason that you can’t get advice from a reseller is not because of them but is because of you – let me explain.

When we go to a company to get advice we must pay for that advice.  One way or another, nothing is ever free.  Resellers traditionally earn their money by providing whatever free advice we desire and then making their money by selling us a product that has been marked up to cover their costs and to provide for their profit.  This is fine, but as the customer we need to understand that we are only compensating that reseller if they convince us to buy a product or a service that they sell and we compensate them better the more of that product that they convince us to buy.  The reseller isn’t at fault here, we need resellers and we need them to make money in this manner.  The issue is going to them and attempting to get free, general advice – we are forcing them to either work for us for free or to sell us something whether it is the right thing for us or not.  We’ve backed them into the proverbial corner and the only reasonable response is for them to attempt to sell us what they offer.  That is, after all, their job.

This leads to an additional problem, of course, which is that resellers don’t have skilled, professional, general-consultants on staff – at least not as a rule.  So if you go to a reseller and ask for advice, that reseller is almost assuredly only trained and knowledgeable on the products that they sell themselves.  They may not even be aware of what other solutions are on the market or, if they do, they do not know them to the same depth as their own products and may be unaware of advantages and caveats that you might need to know to make a truly informed decision.  Even if they did, it is not in their interest to tell you about them – you are only going to compensate them if they sell you something.

This is not to say that resellers are not good, honest, hard-working folk with value for our industry.  They are, but they aren’t magically free consultants like many people expect them to be.  Resellers are there to add consulting and selection assistance, as well as warehousing, repair, logistics and other value-adds, solely around the products that they represent.  Trying to get general consulting from a reseller is like asking your Chevy dealer to advise you as to what vehicle to buy and hoping that they equally consider all major makes, models and types of transportation as well as the regulations and limitations of all of these and are able to apply this to your unique situation – including knowing when to tell you that you don’t need to buy anything at all.  Of course, all they will do is try to sell you the best Chevy that meets your needs whether the best option for you is to just walk, buy an Impala, take a cab or to buy a fifty foot deep-sea fishing trawler.  Even if they did have the expertise to look at the big scope of your transportation needs you aren’t willing to pay them unless they give a specific answer.  So we can expect that the answer we pay for is the one that we will get.

Resellers are useful only after the decision to buy the products that they sell has already been made.  A reseller can then help you choose the right product from the range that they have.  For example, if you are buying a server from a reseller, that reseller can help you to choose which options like drive types and sizes, out of band management and other add-ons you might want.  But even then, be wary that they are likely earning more to upsell you and will recommend unneeded extras or may advise making configuration changes without understanding the entire scope of the project and how those changes from your original requirements might affect you.

Attempt to limit the advice that you receive to very concrete items such as “does this particular model offer this particular feature that I am seeking?” and avoid subjective valuations between products “is this one fast enough or should I buy the bigger one?” or “how does this compare to your competitor’s product?”

When asking subjective questions you are actually pressuring the reseller into either making more money overselling to you or losing money while trying to find the most appropriate product.  Not only do they make more money (generally) selling you the more expensive item but it also mitigates their risk that they didn’t get you what you needed.  There is no reason for them to take on risk, they’ll just try to sell you as much as possible and, if you come back unhappy, they can say “well, we tried to convince you to get a bigger, faster model but you wanted to save money and this is what happens.”  So it is not in their interest in any way to size to your needs but always to pad for safety and profit.  A position that they are put in, again, by their customers.

In most cases, principal vendors are themselves a reseller so can be considered in exactly the same way.  If you call Dell to buy a product, they will sell you a Dell no matter what your needs are.  This is not their fault, they only have one job, to sell you Dell products and if you call them for advice they can only assume that you did so because you wanted to buy a Dell.  They are no more going to consult on what IBM product to buy as they are on what car to drive or if its a good time to sell your house and move to Florida.  But they are very helpful in making sure that the Dell product that you order is going to be the one that you wanted and that the extra parts that you are getting will work with that model.  That’s what they are there for.  They will figure out how long it will take to arrive, go over warranty terms as well as give you pricing and financing options.  These are all things that your general consultant cannot do.  The two roles are complimentary, not competitive.

A perfect example of this entire scenario is one that I see happen in the real world time and time again.  With the recent explosion in virtualization businesses are turning, en masse, to vendors to find out what they need in order to dip their toes into the world of virtualization.  What I see, over and over, is instead of being sold a reasonable virtualization setup they are often sold entire systems including storage and software that in no way meets their needs and, often, actually works against their needs while costing as much as ten to twenty times what a better performing, more reliable system would have cost.  Often they are upsold into a completely unreasonable category of product for their project and then caught by budget limitations and stuck skimping – leaving them with a crippled virtualization project that could have been completed successfully for a fraction of the money spent and leaving good room for growth over time as needed.

The issue, of course, is that turning to a vendor and asking for advice on virtualization products is exactly like saying “I have no idea what I’m doing, let’s see what you can sell me on.”  And honestly, once the vendor knows you don’t even have your architectural elements worked out before contacting them, they know that the sky is the limit.  The goose has arrived and all they have to do is wait for that golden egg to be delivered.

I’ve heard this exact scenario so many times, I can’t count.  Your vendor is not your friend.  They have one job to do – sell you as many products as possible.  If you ask them what you should buy they will tell you whatever you want to hear.  They will cut corners on safety items or management items that they feel you will not find flashy or cool and will sell you what they think you will get excited about or confused about.  They know their jobs well – they have to, it is a tough market.  A great example is vendors cutting storage costs by selling smaller than appropriate storage arrays and using risky array configurations to make the capacity cost less.  That the client is at heightened risk to a failing array doesn’t impact the vendor and is a very hard issue to quantify, so once the product is sold it is the customer’s concern not the vendor’s.

The answer to this is to leverage a general consultant.  A general consultant gets compensated by delivering good advice and not for selling you a product.  In theory a general consultant will earn a similar amount regardless of whether they convince you to install millions of dollars of products or to do nothing and use what you currently own.  A general consultant should be far more intimate with your environment than a vendor or reseller could ever be and should be able to speak to your technical staff, make presentations to the business and put their advice into the proper context for your business with insight into how the costs, risks and other factors will impact you specifically and advise on what they feel is more appropriate for your specific needs.

In reality you still have to consider the complete role of your general consultant.  Most often a general consulting firm will also offer broad support and implementation services.  These are loosely tied to their recommendations so caveat emptor applies as always, but since they are compensated in a far more direct manner (paid for their effort) they have a very real reason to deliver you what you are buying.  Even general consultants who have some ties to reselling often make a very small fraction on the resold goods as they do on the consulting so anything that puts their consulting work at risk is a major liability to them.  Make sure that any general consultant, if offering resold services, is not tied to them and works with other resellers or vendors as well.  Sometimes general consultants offer low cost reseller services as a loss leader or at minimal profit just to keep customers from feeling that they must turn to another company but would prefer if their customers did not use  that service – profits are often higher not reselling.

Your general consultant should be able to interface with your resellers or vendors directly or allow you to do so.  Having a consultant handle the transaction can be beneficial because it provides an integrated procedure and consultants are very unlikely to be persuaded to make snap decisions based on sales, “special deals” or to be sold on a different approach by a salesperson who has a specific product to push that month.  The consultant has little emotional tie to the purchasing process and so can be much more methodical and calculating.

Of course we must consider the opposite situation as well – how do we treat our service providers?  For example, if we go to a reseller over and over again asking for advice, making them generate quotes and generally spin their wheels and then buy nothing from them or very little we will, sooner or later, force them to either refuse to work with us at all or do something drastic like supplying less than accurate data or raising prices.  A good vendor or reseller will provide you with the best value when you treat them well.  Loyalty may seem to be dead in business transactions today, but this is not at all true.  Good relationships still pay off.

With consultants the need to treat them well is somewhat built into the equation – you generally pay for what you get so other than being friendly and respectful you don’t normally have too much to worry about as far as how you are structuring your relationship.  But even with a consultant there are still concerns.  If you pay for an “unlimited” service plan, use it well but don’t abuse it, for example.  Always make your consultant happy that you are their customer and, most likely, they will work hard to make sure that you are happy to be their customer too.

The most important concept to take away from this is that with any company with whom you do business, you should have some empathy for them.  Put yourself in their shoes and think about how your relationship with them is structured.  Are your goals mutually aligned?  Is it in both companies’ interests to act in the interest of the other?  Or have you arranged for an adversarial relationship where they can only win at your expense?

Keep in mind that you are the customer so, very likely, your consultant or reseller is, to some degree, at your mercy to make sure that your relationship is a healthy one.  In order to obtain clients they are often pressured into a position of accepting a less than ideal arrangement.  As the client, you have the opportunity to be the client that that consultant or reseller is excited to work for and will go out of their way to make happy.  The choice is very much yours to make in most cases.  Choose well because good relationships can work wonders for your business.

Ask a jeweler what to get your wife for your anniversary and he will say: “You can’t go wrong with jewelry.”

Ask a florist what to get your wife and he will tell you: “Women always love flowers.”

Ask a chocolatier and he will tell you that nothing makes a woman happier than chocolate.

Ask a consultant he will ask you: “What does your wife like?”

Share
Scott Alan Miller

7 Reasons It’s Time for Windows 7

What’s your reason for not upgrading to Windows 7? Many IT managers wait for the first service pack before deploying an OS upgrade; others update the operating system as part of a hardware refresh. Here are some advantages to upgrading.

1) Inevitability

If you have been watching Microsoft’s enterprise desktop operating systems over the past two decades then you are aware that there is a pattern emerging and that pattern places Windows 7 as the long term successor to Windows XP and that XP was the clear successor to NT 4.0.  Each of these were the golden child of the Microsoft machine, blessed with prime market positioning, lack of extreme overhauls and sporting a high level of polish.  As such, whether you are seeking the latest and greatest or just looking for the best desktop OS investment, Windows 7 meets your needs.  Windows 7 is here to stay and adoption rates are already very high.

Once you accept that Windows 7 is coming to your environment sometime over the next several years then the question truly becomes: “What are you waiting for?”  The sooner that you get Windows 7 in place, the sooner you can make the transition and the sooner you can start reaping the benefits of the latest technologies and nearly a decade of development since Windows XP originally released – and let’s face it, most shops are moving from XP to 7 today.  You will achieve your greatest benefits from Windows 7 the sooner that you put it in place giving your users maximum time to adapt to it and giving you more time to take advantage of its features.
2) Performance

One of the biggest complaints of users who switched to Vista from XP was a lack of performance.  Windows 7 addressed this very well and is more performant than Vista and has lower minimum requirements allowing it be used in the Netbook realm that had been previously reserved for Windows XP up through the Vista era.  Windows 7 runs nicely on Vista-era equipment and much of the XP-era equipment while taking good advantage of new hardware as well making it a good option for in-place software upgrades.

Having a Windows operating system that actually outperforms its predecessor on the same hardware is a major feat.  Traditionally an OS was only expected to be comparable or faster when used on hardware current to its release.  Unlike any other Windows upgrade, Windows 7 can be deployed onto existing hardware without needing hardware upgrades and you will still see small performance gains.  This alone removes one of the traditional obstacles to in-place operating system upgrades.
3) Security

Security is always of concern and Windows 7 comes with a slew of security enhancements.  The best one results in an improved user experience as well – the update of User Account Control (UAC.)  This update makes UAC, the bane of Windows Vista, into the security tool that it was always meant to be.  UAC is now easy to use and control but still powerful enough to protect you in critical ways.  Moving from XP to 7 provides a very important security update from a technology side while moving from Vista to 7 makes this technology user friendly enough that it can remain enabled without the bulk of users demanding that it be removed.
4) Solid State Drive Support

With solid state drives rapidly dropping in price and growing in popularity, having specific support for them in Windows 7 is a very big deal today but especially over the next few years as solid state drives move from the realm of power user equipment to mainstream user equipment.  Solid state drives work best when the drivers handling them are aware that they are solid state.  SSDs should not be treated like tradition, spindle-based hard drives for maximum performance and reliability benefits.

Windows 7′s solid state enhancements like TRIM and removal of spindle drive tools like Superfetch and ReadyBoost give SSDs better performance and longer lifespan on Windows 7 then on previous Windows iterations.  These features may not seem like a big deal today but over the lifespan of Windows 7, as SSDs become more and more of an expected desktop component for the average office worker these SSD-specific features will play a bigger and bigger role.
5) XP Mode

XP Mode is one of those really stand-out features that sets Windows 7 apart from its predecessors.  Previous Windows version have struggled in handling legacy applications.  Windows 7′s new approach of including a Windows XP operating system as a complete virtual machine handles this issue in a graceful way.  Now legacy apps are more reliable and the Windows 7 system is not encumbered with extra subsystems needed to handle legacy systems.  With Windows XP having been such a dominant player like no Windows platform had been before, this approach is brilliant and a shrewd move on Microsoft’s part.  XP Mode delivers a level of confidence that existing apps will continue to work on Windows 7 – even apps that no longer see active development and are not being tested against the newest Microsoft operating systems.  Once again, Windows 7 provides more than its predecessor in an area where we would not expect to see this – backwards compatibility.  Windows 7 is dramatically more compatible with Windows XP software than Vista is.
6) Branch Cache

Enterprise customers can leverage Branch Cache, Microsoft’s new WAN optimization technology targeted at supporting branch offices within a larger, enterprise environment.  Branch Cache can be a significant feature for the many companies who struggle with providing storage resources out to small, remote offices.  Branch Cache’s ability to seamlessly store previously accessed CIFS and web resources out at a branch office can, for some businesses, mean that extra equipment and larger Internet connections need not be purchased which can result in substantial cost savings and branch office productivity gains.  Branch Cache will also reduce loads on central storage systems allowing file server dollars to be stretched a little farther too.
7) Direct Access

Previous versions of Windows have had VPN products included with them but Direct Access takes the idea of “always connected mobility” to a new level.  Direct Access adds seamless VPN to Windows which gives users a unified experience between remote and “in office” computing modes.  No longer do users need to manage their VPN experience – as long as they are online they are connected to the office.  Direct Access leverages IPv6 and IPSec for simple, efficient and extremely secure remote computing.  Direct Access is designed to work with Microsoft’s existing authentication systems allowing it to be used for normal, everyday computing without breaking communications with Active Directory so that both the machine and the user can properly authenticate – even when working remotely.

Summary) At the end of the day, however, what makes Windows 7 compelling isn’t any significant feature.  In fact, it is the lack of major features that makes Windows 7 so important.  Like XP, its spiritual predecessor, Windows 7 tweaks a working formula.  Vista introduced the new kernel, the new interface, UAC and other features.  Introducing change is painful.  Windows 7 takes what works and makes it better.  Windows 7 is the long term, strategic desktop decision because it is a polished system that introduces small, incremental updates and relies on established features to drive its overarching value.  Think of 7 as the evolutionary whereas Vista was revolutionary.

Share

Next »

  • Buy Cheapest bayer levitra online pharmacy Online Pharmacy Store. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buying Cheapest where can i get cialis. Offshore Pharmacy, Good Prices. Low Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest diflucan information Now Best Prices. Top Online Pharmacy Supplier.
  • Buy Cheap cheap soft viagra Online Guaranteed Shipping. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheapest levitra result Now Best Prices. Top Online Pharmacy Supplier.
  • Buy Cheap canadian pharmacy levitra Now Drugs, Health And Beauty. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheapest levitra generic Now Cheap Online Pharmacy. Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheap find cheap cialis Now Best Prices. FDA Approved Rx: Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap purchase phentermine mexico Online Cheap Online Pharmacy. Online Medical Shop.
  • Buy Cheapest tramadol maximum dosage Now WorldWide Shipping. Cheap Online Pharmacy.
  • Buying Cheap online pharmacy no prescriptions. Offshore Rx, Good Prices. Top Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap diflucan effects Now Cheap Pharmacy Online. WorldWide Shipping.
  • Buy Cheap breast cancer prevention Online Online Medical Shop. Best Drugstore.
  • Buy cialis free coupon Without Prescription Doctor. Pharmacy At The Best Price!
  • Buy Cheapest diet and weight loss product Now Pharmacy Store. Buy Medications Online.
  • Buy Cheap clomid 25mg Now Best Drugstore. Order Cheap Meds Without Rx.
  • Buy canadian pharmacy Online Without Prescription. Low Prices. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheap vitamin store for sale Now Free Viagra Pills! Special Prices For vitamin store for sale!
  • cheap phentermine without a prescription Online Without Prescription Low Prices. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheap headache relief medications Online Guaranteed Shipping. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheap list of anti anxiety medications Online 24/Online Pharmacy. Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheap vardenafil discount Now Cheap Online Pharmacy. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheap atarax information Now Low Prices. Drug Store Without A Prescription.
  • Buy Cheap pain medicine ultram Online 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest buy valium no presciption Online Best Drugstore. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheap generic amoxicillin Online Best Drugstore. Online Medical Shop.
  • Buy Cheapest sildenafil oral Online Buy Medications Online. Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheap prescription medication Now 24/Online Pharmacy. Cheap Pharmacy Online.
  • Buy Cheap usa diazepam fed ex Now The Largest Internet Pharmacy. Best Online.
  • Buy Cheap cheap tramadol without prescription Online Best Internet. Internet Prices For cheap tramadol without prescription!
  • Buy Cheapest cialis discounted Now Online Prices For cialis discounted! Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheap buy lipitor online Now Guaranteed Shipping. Cheap Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap lasix dosage Now Best Prices. Internet Prices For lasix dosage!
  • Buy cost of chlamydia medication Without Prescription Doctor. Best Internet. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheap cialis lowest price Now Pharmacy Store. Top Online Pharmacy Supplier.
  • Buy Cheap doxycycline tablets Online Drugs, Health And Beauty. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheapest prices cialis Now Pharmacy At The Best Price! Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest german online pharmacies Now Cheap Prescription Drugs. Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheapest ambien 10 mg Now Pharmacy Store. Discount Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap klonopin social anxiety Online Best Prices. Order Cheap Meds Without Rx.
  • Buy Cheapest ampicillin side effects Now Pharmacy At The Best Price! Best Online.
  • Buy Cheap levaquin used to treat Online WorldWide Shipping. No Prescription Needed.
  • Buy Cheap lasix without prescription Now No Prescription Needed For Drugs. Best Prices.
  • buy acomplia Online Without Prescription Best Internet. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheapest cialis italia Online Low Prices. Discount Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheapest online stores hair loss products Online Best Internet. Discount Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap levitra male enhancement Now Online Prices For levitra male enhancement! Best Internet.
  • Buy viagra cheap buy online Online Without Prescription. Pharmacy Store. Low Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest mexico levitra Now Cheap Online Pharmacy. Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheapest ultram 100 mg Online Best Internet. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheapest low cost brand viagra fast Online Drugs, Health And Beauty. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheap ultram drug Online Buy Medications Online. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheapest top rated diet pills Now Special Prices For top rated diet pills! Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheap phentermine online doctor Online Best Internet. Discount Pharmacy Online.
  • Buy Cheap over the counter drugs Online Best Drugstore. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheapest rimonabant with no prescription Now Pharmacy At The Best Price! Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheapest codeine prescription 60mg Now Cheap Pharmacy Online. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheap non prescription drugs Now 24/Online Pharmacy. Cheap Pharmacy Online.
  • Buy Cheapest buy australian viagra Online Best Online. Internet Prices For buy australian viagra!
  • Buy Cheap canadian mail order drugs Now Discount Online Pharmacy. Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheapest order tenormin Online Buy Medications Online. Low Prices.
  • Buy Cheap how to control your appetite Now Low Prices. No Prescription Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap pet skin inflammation treatment Now Pharmacy Store. Internet Prices For pet skin inflammation treatment!
  • Buy Cheapest cures for panic disorder Now Top Online Pharmacy. Cheap Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap augmentin antibiotic Now Best Drugstore. Online Prices For augmentin antibiotic!
  • Buy Cheapest what diet pills really work Online Best Internet. Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheap levitra online order Now Pharmacy At The Best Price! Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheap order phentermine c o d Now Special Prices For order phentermine c o d! Free Viagra Pills!
  • Buy Cheapest lipitor 20mg Now Best Drugstore. Pharmacy At The Best Price!
  • Buy Cheap how to take levitra Online Drugs, Health And Beauty. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy order levitra online Without Prescription Doctor. Pharmacy Store. Low Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest plavix price Online Best Online. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheap pharmacy valium Online Cheap Prescription Drugs. Best Online.
  • Buying Cheap prescripion weight loss drugs. Mexican Rx, Good Prices. 24/Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheapest fat burn appetite suppress Now Best Drugstore. 24/Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap order aldactone Online Drugs, Health And Beauty. Best Online.
  • Buy Cheapest online prescription pills Now Drugs, Health And Beauty. Best Online.
  • recreational viagra use Online Without Prescription WorldWide Shipping. Best Prices.
  • health med Online Without Prescription Low Prices. Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheapest diet pill on line pharmacy Now Best Internet. Order Cheap Meds Without Rx.
  • Buy Cheapest pills for bipolar disorder Online Low Prices. Online Prices For pills for bipolar disorder!
  • Buy Cheapest newest weight loss pill Online Top Online Pharmacy. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheapest how much does viagra cost Online Guaranteed Shipping. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheap tramadol overnight delivery Now No Prescription Needed. Best Drugstore.
  • Buy Cheap buy prescription diet pills Now Drugs, Health And Beauty. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheapest cheapest online cialis Now Guaranteed Shipping. 24/Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap ativan used Now No Prescription Online Pharmacy. Best Online.
  • Buy Cheap klonopin blood pressure Online Best Prices. 24/Internet)(safe Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap antidepressant pill high Online Discount Pharmacy Online. Pharmacy Store.
  • Buy Cheap 100mg viagra professional Now Online Medical Shop. Top Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheapest order super viagra Online WorldWide Shipping. Top Online Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheapest price nexium Now Top Online Pharmacy. WorldWide Shipping.
  • Buy Cheapest diazepam no prescription Now Online Prices For diazepam no prescription! Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheapest purchase medications on-line Online 24/Online Pharmacy. Best Prices.
  • Buy Cheap order tenormin Online Best Online. The Largest Internet Pharmacy.
  • Buy Cheap compare lipitor Online Order Cheap Meds Without Rx. Best Internet.
  • Buy Cheap international pharmacy klonopin Now Cheap Pharmacy Online. Buy Medications Online.
  • Buy Cheapest pain medication without a prescription Online Free Viagra Pills! Best Internet.
  • Buying Cheap treatment of childhood obesity. Offshore Rx, Good Prices. Guaranteed Shipping.
  • Buy Cheap no prescription valium Online Cheap Prescription Drugs. Low Prices.